Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Vermont granted Harkamal Singh’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that immigration authorities violated Singh’s Fifth Amendment due process rights by re-detaining him after his prior discretionary release without providing notice, an opportunity to be heard, or evidence of changed circumstances. The court ordered Respondents to immediately release Singh.
Holdings
- A noncitizen who has been granted discretionary release from immigration custody has a protected liberty interest in remaining free from detention, even if the noncitizen lacks lawful immigration status.
- When immigration authorities re-detain a noncitizen who was previously released from immigration custody, due process requires some process, including notice and an opportunity to be heard, before or contemporaneously with the re-detention.
- Immediate release was the appropriate remedy for Singh's detention without constitutionally required process.
Questions Presented
- Whether Singh had a protected liberty interest in remaining free from immigration detention after his prior discretionary release by immigration authorities.
- Whether the Fifth Amendment required immigration authorities to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before or contemporaneously with re-detaining Singh after a prior release, absent evidence of changed circumstances.
- Whether Singh was entitled to immediate release as the remedy for his unconstitutional detention.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (14)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690, 693 (2001)(followed)
- Velasco Lopez v. Decker, 978 F.3d 842, 850-51 (2d Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 781 (2008)(followed)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332-35 (1976)(followed)
- Nielson v. Preap, 586 U.S. 392, 397-98 (2019)(applied)
- Matter of Sugay, 17 I. & N. Dec. 637, 640 (B.I.A. 1981)(followed)
- Saravia v. Sessions, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1168, 1197 (N.D. Cal. 2017), aff'd sub nom. Saravia for A.H. v. Sessions, 905 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Valdez v. Joyce, 803 F. Supp. 3d 213, 217-18 (S.D.N.Y. June 18, 2025)(followed)
- Lopez v. Sessions, No. 18 Civ. 4189 (RWS), 2018 WL 2932726, at *12 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2018)(followed)
- Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…