Summary
The document is proposed findings and recommendations in Jose Enrique Mendiola’s successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice because Mendiola did not obtain authorization from the Eighth Circuit to file a second or successive habeas petition.
Holdings
- A district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second or successive federal habeas petition unless the petitioner first obtains authorization from the appropriate court of appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).
- An unauthorized second or successive § 2254 petition should be dismissed without prejudice so that the petitioner may refile if the court of appeals grants authorization.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court had jurisdiction to consider Mendiola's § 2254 petition when he had previously filed a federal habeas petition but had not obtained Eighth Circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition.
- Whether the petition should be dismissed without prejudice pending any authorization from the Eighth Circuit.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (8)
- State of Arkansas v. Jose Enrique Mendiola Jr., No. 60CR-03-2538, https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov(background)
- Mendiola v. State of Arkansas, 92 Ark. App. 359, 214 S.W.3d 271 (2005)(background)
- Mendiola v. State of Arkansas, No. CR07-915, 2009 WL 102733 (Ark. Jan. 15, 2009)(background)
- Mendiola v. Hobbs, 5:09-cv-00226-BSM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 13, 2009)(background)
- Williams v. Hobbs, 658 F.3d 842, 853 (8th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147, 152-53, 157 (2007)(followed)
- Crone v. Cockrell, 324 F.3d 833, 836 (Sth Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 530 (2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…