Summary
The court grants Brightspeed Broadband, LLC’s motion for summary judgment and denies Ritter Communications Holdings, LLC’s motion for partial summary judgment in a contract dispute concerning telecommunications service orders. Applying Delaware law, the court holds that the Master Services Agreement was incorporated into the Service Orders and that Ritter’s claims accrued when Brightspeed canceled the orders, not when an early termination charge became due. Because Ritter filed suit more than one year after the alleged breach, the court concludes that the claims are barred by the contractual limitations provision, cancels the scheduled bench trial, and directs the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The Master Services Agreement applied to the Service Order Agreements because the Service Orders expressly incorporated the Master Services Agreement and its terms and conditions.
- Neither the Master Services Agreement nor the Service Orders were ambiguous.
- Ritter's cause of action accrued no later than June 13, 2023, when Brightspeed canceled the Service Orders, rather than on August 22, 2023, when the early termination charge invoice became due.
- Section 6.2 of the Master Services Agreement barred all causes of action asserted by Ritter because the action was filed more than one year after the June 13, 2023 breach.
- Brightspeed was entitled to summary judgment on all claims, and Ritter was not entitled to partial summary judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Master Services Agreement was incorporated into and governed the Service Order Agreements.
- Whether the Master Services Agreement and Service Order Agreements were ambiguous.
- Whether Ritter's claims accrued when Brightspeed canceled the Service Orders or when the early termination charge invoice became due.
- Whether the Master Services Agreement's one-year contractual limitations provision barred Ritter's claims.
- Whether Brightspeed was entitled to summary judgment on all claims and Ritter was entitled to partial summary judgment.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (23)
- Holloway v. Lockhart, 813 F.2d 874 (8th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 250 (1986)(followed)
- Inland Oil & Transp. Co. v. United States, 600 F.2d 725 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 991 (1979)(followed)
- Counts v. M.K. Ferguson Co., 862 F.2d 1338, 1339 (8th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- City of Mt. Pleasant v. Associated Elec. Coop., 838 F.2d 268, 273-274 (8th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. Youngs, 2022 WL 1017813, at *2 (D. Minn. Apr. 5, 2022)(followed)
- Fjelstad v. State Farm Ins. Co., 845 F. Supp. 2d 981, 984 (D. Minn. 2012)(followed)
- Young Am.'s Found. v. Kaler, 482 F. Supp. 3d 829, 851 (D. Minn. 2020)(followed)
- United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Hldgs., Inc., 937 A.2d 810, 830 (Del. Ch. 2007)(followed)
- Rhone–Poulenc Basic Chems. Co. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., 616 A.2d 1192, 1196, 1198 (Del. 1992)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.