Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Abdullo Idiev's request for appointment of counsel in his habeas proceeding. The court held that there is no absolute right to appointed counsel in habeas proceedings and that the interests of justice did not currently require appointment.
Holdings
- There is no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings, and counsel should not be appointed at this stage because the interests of justice did not require it.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should appoint counsel for the petitioner in the habeas proceeding.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…