Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations after reviewing the plaintiff’s objections. The court dismissed the § 1983 complaint without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and directed the clerk to terminate pending motions and close the case.
Holdings
- The district court presumed the magistrate judge's factual findings correct and reviewed the magistrate judge's conclusions of law de novo.
- The findings and recommendations were adopted in full, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations after reviewing Plaintiff's objections.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…