Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California ordered plaintiff Roberto J. Edwards to show cause why his action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. The court required him to respond within twenty-one days and, if he wished to continue the lawsuit, to file an amended complaint.
Holdings
- A federal district court may use its inherent docket-management authority to impose sanctions, including dismissal, when a party fails to prosecute an action, obey a court order, or comply with applicable local rules.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court may require plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.
- Whether plaintiff should be given an additional twenty-one days to explain his failure to file an amended complaint or to file an amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…