Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a state prisoner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action. The court granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss, dismissed the action with prejudice, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- The district court presumed that factual findings were correct and reviewed the magistrate judge's legal conclusions de novo.
- The magistrate judge's findings and recommendations were adopted in full, respondent's motion to dismiss was granted, and the habeas action was dismissed with prejudice.
- The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations when neither party filed objections.
- Whether respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted and the § 2254 action dismissed with prejudice.
- Whether to issue a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…