Ihab Nadhim Kifah v. John Zanoni, Sheriff

Kifah v. Sheriff · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 4, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-00856-JLT-SKO (HC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recommends granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss a state pretrial detainee’s habeas petition. The court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 and 2241 because the petitioner is in state custody and a federal detainer does not establish federal custody, and it also finds the claims unexhausted.

Holdings

  1. A state pretrial detainee is not held pursuant to a state-court judgment and therefore cannot invoke 28 U.S.C. § 2254 jurisdiction on that basis.
  2. A federal detainer or hold, without more, does not place a state detainee in federal custody for purposes of § 2241; therefore, the court lacked jurisdiction over Kifah's petition.
  3. The petition was unexhausted because Kifah had not presented his claims to the available California appellate courts or the California Supreme Court.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a state pretrial detainee may obtain habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 when he is not held pursuant to a state-court judgment.
  2. Whether a federal detainer, standing alone, places a state detainee in federal custody sufficient to establish jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
  3. Whether the petition should be dismissed for failure to exhaust available state remedies.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Braden v. Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 503 (1973)(followed)
  • Jacobs v. McCaughtry, 251 F.3d 596, 597 (7th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Bingaman v. Warden, El Dorado Cnty. Jail, 2023 WL 7338852, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 2023)(followed)
  • Bingaman v. Warden, 2023 WL 8452775 (E.D. Cal. 2023)(followed)
  • Garcia v. Taylor, 40 F.3d 299, 303 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Carter v. Uribe, 2010 WL 234803, at *2 (C.D. Cal. 2010)(followed)
  • Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d 311, 313 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 518-22 (1982)(followed)
  • Gatlin v. Madding, 189 F.3d 882, 888 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Duncan v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364, 365-66 (1995)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…