Michael Alan Dean Hill v. Lt. Payne, et al.

Hill v. Payne · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · November 12, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-0433 DAD CKD P

Summary

A United States Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing Michael Alan Dean Hill’s action without prejudice because he did not file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline. The recommendation cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 110 and advises that objections may be filed within fourteen days.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint after being granted leave to amend.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (1)

  • Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…