Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California struck Plaintiff Mike Morgan’s second amended complaint because it was filed without leave of court or a stipulation of all parties. The action proceeds on the first amended complaint against Defendants Davies and Espinoza.
Holdings
- Plaintiff could not amend the pleading as of right because the second amended complaint was filed more than 21 days after service of a responsive pleading and was not filed pursuant to a stipulation; leave of court was therefore required.
- The second amended complaint was stricken because it was filed without the required leave of court or stipulation.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff could file a second amended complaint without leave of court or a stipulation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.
- Whether the improperly filed second amended complaint should be stricken and the action allowed to proceed on the first amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 813 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 1181 (E.D. Cal. 2011)(followed)
- Sexton v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-00898-TLN-AC, 2022 WL 976914 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2022)(followed)
- Guthrie v. Hurwitz, Case No. 1:18-cv-00282-AWI-BAM, 2018 WL 4005261, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…