Tiffany Harrison Shabazz v. Debra Kahn, et al.

Shabazz v. Kahn · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · December 1, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-02813-TLN-CSK PS

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Tiffany Harrison Shabazz's request to proceed in forma pauperis and screens her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court dismisses the claims for wrongful death, elder abuse, and violation of civil rights without prejudice, identifying issues including statute of limitations, lack of adequately pleaded state action, insufficient factual allegations, and improper pro se representation of an estate and minor children. The court grants leave to amend within 30 days.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff made the required financial showing and was entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.
  2. The complaint, as pleaded, appeared to be filed outside the applicable two-year limitations period for the § 1983 claim and related claims, but dismissal without prejudice was appropriate because Plaintiff might be able to plead facts supporting equitable or other tolling.
  3. Plaintiff could not prosecute claims on behalf of her minor children or the Estate of Iman Shabazz without retaining counsel.
  4. The complaint failed to allege sufficient facts showing that Defendants, who appeared to be private medical-care providers, acted under color of state law or that a government actor was involved.
  5. The complaint did not plead sufficient facts to state claims for wrongful death or elder abuse or neglect, but leave to amend was warranted.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff satisfied the financial requirements to proceed in forma pauperis.
  2. Whether the complaint was subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim or because the claims appeared barred by the statute of limitations.
  3. Whether a pro se plaintiff may represent minor children or an estate without counsel.
  4. Whether the complaint adequately alleged that the Defendants acted under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  5. Whether the complaint adequately stated California wrongful-death and elder-abuse or neglect claims.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (33)

  • Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)(followed)
  • Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327(followed)
  • Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592 F.3d 954, 960(followed)
  • Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7(followed)
  • Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 624(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57, 570(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678(followed)
  • Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877(followed)
  • C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697(followed)
  • Gutierrez v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. (D.C.F.S.), 2022 WL 3574691, at *2(followed)

Showing top 10 of 33.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…