Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Wayne Matthew Hasbrook’s request for an interview with a U.S. Marshal. The court advised that the action had not commenced because Hasbrook had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete in forma pauperis application and certified inmate trust account statement, and it noted that abstention principles applied because of a pending state criminal proceeding. The court re-served prior orders and granted Hasbrook 30 days to file objections and the required filing materials.
Holdings
- The action was not yet commenced for screening purposes because plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a completed in forma pauperis application with a certified inmate trust account statement covering the six months before filing.
- The federal court could not exercise jurisdiction over the issues raised in the filing because a state criminal proceeding was pending and no special or extraordinary circumstances were identified to justify federal intervention.
- Plaintiff's request for an interview with a U.S. Marshal was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's request for an interview with a U.S. Marshal should be granted.
- Whether the federal court could address issues raised in plaintiff's filing while a state criminal proceeding was pending.
- Whether the court could screen plaintiff's complaint before plaintiff paid the filing fee or submitted a compliant application to proceed in forma pauperis.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- People v. Hasbrook, No. 25MI003396(relied_on)
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Association, 629 F.3d 992, 999 (9th Cir. 2010)(relied_on)
- White v. Martel, 601 F.3d 882, 885 (9th Cir. 2010)(relied_on)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45 (1971)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…