Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denies Robert Wooten’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order adopting findings and recommendations and closing the case. The court concludes that the motion identifies no basis for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b), and orders that the case remain closed.
Holdings
- The motion for reconsideration was properly denied because plaintiff identified no basis warranting reconsideration and merely reiterated his grievances against defendant.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's motion for reconsideration established a basis for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), Rule 60(b), or Local Rule 230(j).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Bestran Corp. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc., 720 F.2d 1019, 1019 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Rishor v. Ferguson, 822 F.3d 482, 490 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Weeks v. Bayer, 246 F.3d 1231, 1236 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…