Erick Adony Perez-Valderamos v. Todd Lyons, et al.

Civil Action No. 26-182-DLB (E.D. Ky. June 5, 2026) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Northern Division at Covington · June 5, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 26-182-DLB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granted Erick Adony Perez-Valderamos’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his immigration detention. Relying on Sixth Circuit precedent, the court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225, governed his detention and that his prior bond hearing was constitutionally inadequate. The court ordered his immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government must establish dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence.

Holdings

  1. Section 1226(a) governs the detention of a noncitizen who entered the United States years earlier, was released into the country, and is not seeking admission, rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of § 1225.
  2. Detaining petitioner without an individualized detention hearing under the applicable § 1226(a) framework violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause.
  3. A bond hearing conducted under § 1225 did not satisfy due process when § 1226(a) governed petitioner's detention, and the court could review the adequacy of the hearing procedures even though § 1226(e) barred review of discretionary custody decisions.
  4. The proper remedy was immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing under § 1226(a) at which the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that continued detention is justified.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1225, governed the detention of a noncitizen who had entered the United States years earlier and was not seeking admission.
  2. Whether the petitioner's detention violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause because he had not received an individualized detention hearing under the proper statutory framework.
  3. Whether the proper remedy was immediate release or a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (18)

  • Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026)(followed)
  • A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94 (2025)(followed)
  • Trump v. J.G.G., 604 U.S. 670, 673 (2025)(followed)
  • Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 321 (1976)(followed)
  • Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 531 (2004)(followed)
  • Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
  • Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86, 101 (1903)(followed)
  • Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 268 (1970)(followed)
  • Edahi v. Lewis, No. 4:25-cv-129-RGJ, 2025 WL 3466682, at *14 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…