Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granted Erick Adony Perez-Valderamos’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his immigration detention. Relying on Sixth Circuit precedent, the court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225, governed his detention and that his prior bond hearing was constitutionally inadequate. The court ordered his immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government must establish dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence.
Holdings
- Section 1226(a) governs the detention of a noncitizen who entered the United States years earlier, was released into the country, and is not seeking admission, rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of § 1225.
- Detaining petitioner without an individualized detention hearing under the applicable § 1226(a) framework violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause.
- A bond hearing conducted under § 1225 did not satisfy due process when § 1226(a) governed petitioner's detention, and the court could review the adequacy of the hearing procedures even though § 1226(e) barred review of discretionary custody decisions.
- The proper remedy was immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing under § 1226(a) at which the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that continued detention is justified.
Questions Presented
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1225, governed the detention of a noncitizen who had entered the United States years earlier and was not seeking admission.
- Whether the petitioner's detention violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause because he had not received an individualized detention hearing under the proper statutory framework.
- Whether the proper remedy was immediate release or a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (18)
- Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026)(followed)
- A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94 (2025)(followed)
- Trump v. J.G.G., 604 U.S. 670, 673 (2025)(followed)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 321 (1976)(followed)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 531 (2004)(followed)
- Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
- Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86, 101 (1903)(followed)
- Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 268 (1970)(followed)
- Edahi v. Lewis, No. 4:25-cv-129-RGJ, 2025 WL 3466682, at *14 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.