Summary
A magistrate judge recommends dismissing Brian Washington’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The recommendation states that Washington failed to provide a current address or respond to a show-cause order after mail was returned as undeliverable.
Holdings
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a court, in its discretion, to dismiss a claim for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a court order, and such a dismissal ordinarily operates as an adjudication on the merits.
- Washington's failure to provide a current address, respond to the show-cause order, or otherwise prosecute the action warranted dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(b).
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's show-cause order.
- Whether a pro se litigant's failure to notify the court of an address change may support dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Markwell v. County of Bexar, 878 F.2d 899, 902 (5th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Price v. McGlathery, 792 F.2d 472, 474-75 (5th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Silas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 586 F.2d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706, 708-09 (5th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Birl v. Estelle, 660 F.2d 592, 593 (5th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Beard v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc., 214 F. App'x 459, 462 (5th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Kersh v. Derozier, 851 F.2d 1509, 1512 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Lewis v. Hardy, 248 F. App'x 589, 2007 WL 2809969, at *4 n.1 (5th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…