Dodiyi Williamwest v. Sherry Richardson, et al.

Williamwest · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana · December 10, 2025 · No. No. 21-800

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied Dodiyi Williamwest’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The court held that although the motion indicated financial hardship, the proposed appellate issue was conclusory and lacked an arguable basis in law or fact, making the appeal frivolous and not taken in good faith.

Holdings

  1. A party seeking to appeal in forma pauperis must show inability to pay, identify the issues intended for appeal, and demonstrate that the appeal is taken in good faith.
  2. Williamwest's appeal was not taken in good faith because his proposed argument was conclusory and lacked an arguable basis in law or fact.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Williamwest satisfied the requirements for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
  2. Whether the proposed appeal was taken in good faith because it presented a nonfrivolous issue with an arguable basis in law or fact.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Prows v. Kastner, 842 F.2d 138, 140 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983)(followed)
  • Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962)(followed)
  • United States v. Arroyo-Jurado, 477 F. App'x 150, 151 (5th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Kingery v. Hale, 73 F. App'x 755, 755 (5th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Chalmers v. Ridge, 100 F. App'x 961, 963 (5th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Spearman v. Collins, 500 F. App'x 742, 744 (10th Cir. 2012)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…