Summary
On remand from the Fifth Circuit, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recalculated Jamal Vaughn’s future lost wage damages under the methodology required by Culver v. Slater Boat Co. The court reduced the prior future wage-loss award from $750,000 to $600,000, using a 33.04-year work-life estimate, a projected annual post-injury income of $28,733.12, and a 1.3% below-market discount rate. The court also held that post-judgment interest on the amended future wage-loss award accrued from the date of the initial judgment, June 22, 2023.
Holdings
- Applying Culver II, the court reduced the prior future-wage-loss award from $750,000 to $600,000. The court used a 33.04-year remaining work life, treated Vaughn's injury-time earnings as the base, used $28,733.12 as his expected post-injury annual earnings, and applied a 1.3% below-market discount rate without adding speculative wage increases attributable to factors other than inflation.
- Post-judgment interest on the amended $600,000 future lost-wage award accrued from the date of the original judgment, June 22, 2023, because the Fifth Circuit substantially affirmed the original judgment and remanded only for recalculation of one component of damages.
Questions Presented
- What amount of future lost earnings should be awarded on remand under the four-step methodology required by Culver II?
- Whether post-judgment interest on the recalculated future lost-wage award accrued from the date of the original judgment or the date of the judgment entered on remand.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- Vaughn v. American Commercial Barge Line, L.L.C., No. 23-30494, 2025 WL 2945812, at *3-4 (5th Cir. Oct. 17, 2025)(followed)
- Culver v. Slater Boat Co. (Culver II), 722 F.2d 114, 117-22 (5th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Sanders v. Weeks Marine, Inc., No. 23-7317, 2024 WL 4346515, at *7 (E.D. La. Sept. 30, 2024)(followed)
- ExxonMobil Corp. v. Electrical Reliability Services, Inc., 868 F.3d 408, 419-20 (5th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Brooks v. United States, 757 F.2d 734, 740-41 (5th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Vickers v. Chiles Drilling Co. (Vickers I), 822 F.2d 535, 540-41 (5th Cir. 1987)(distinguished)
- Vickers v. Chiles Drilling Co. (Vickers II), 882 F.2d 158, 159 (5th Cir. 1989)(distinguished)
- Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Co., 929 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1991)(distinguished)
- Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Co., 934 F.2d 67, 68 (5th Cir. 1991)(distinguished)
- Masinter v. Marlin Drilling Co., Inc., 938 F.2d 536 (5th Cir. 1991)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.