Summary
The court grants Birner STL LLC’s motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings in Donald Stephen Redus’s FLSA and Missouri wage-law action. The court finds that Birner presented sufficient unrebutted evidence that Redus electronically assented to a valid arbitration agreement containing an enforceable class action waiver, and rejects Redus’s formation, unconscionability, and limited-discovery arguments.
Holdings
- Birner established through the electronically signed agreement and its HR manager's unrebutted declaration that Redus received, reviewed, and assented to a valid arbitration agreement.
- Redus did not create a genuine issue of material fact merely by asserting evidentiary gaps; he was required to identify specific evidence disputing formation or assent.
- The agreement encompassed Redus's employment-related FLSA and Missouri wage-and-hour claims.
- The class-action waiver was enforceable and required Redus's FLSA claims to be arbitrated individually.
- Redus failed to establish that the arbitration agreement or class-action waiver was unconscionable.
- The proceeding was stayed pending arbitration, and the parties were ordered to notify the court within ten days after arbitration concluded.
Questions Presented
- Whether Birner established the existence of a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement under Missouri contract law.
- Whether the arbitration agreement encompasses Redus's FLSA overtime and Missouri wage claims.
- Whether the agreement's class-action waiver is enforceable as to Redus's FLSA collective-action claims.
- Whether Redus presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute of material fact concerning formation or assent.
- Whether the arbitration agreement is unconscionable.
- Whether the federal action should be stayed pending arbitration.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (22)
- Hoffman v. Cargill Inc., 236 F.3d 458, 461 (8th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339 (2011)(followed)
- Pro Tech Indus., Inc. v. URS Corp., 377 F.3d 868, 871 (8th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Foster v. Walmart, Inc., 15 F.4th 860, 862-63 (8th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 67 (2010)(followed)
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938, 944 (1995)(followed)
- City of Benkelman, Neb. v. Baseline Eng'g Corp., 867 F.3d 875, 881-82 (8th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Ballou v. Asset Mktg. Servs., LLC, 46 F.4th 844, 851 (8th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc)(followed)
- Tinder v. Pinkerton Sec., 305 F.3d 728, 735 (7th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…