Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning screening of a pro se complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court dismissed without prejudice the plaintiff’s Title VII, ADA, and FHA disability-discrimination claims for failure to state a claim, while allowing the FHA racial-discrimination claim to proceed.
Holdings
- When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation, the district court reviews the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions for clear error and may adopt the recommendation without providing an explanation.
- The court dismissed plaintiff's Title VII race-discrimination and hostile-work-environment claims, ADA disability-discrimination claim, and FHA disability-discrimination claim without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
- Plaintiff's FHA housing-discrimination claim based on race was allowed to proceed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review the unobjected-to memorandum and recommendation for clear error and adopt it.
- Whether plaintiff's Title VII race-discrimination and hostile-work-environment claims, ADA disability-discrimination claim, and FHA disability-discrimination claim should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim.
- Whether plaintiff's FHA racial-discrimination claim could proceed beyond initial screening.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…