Ashley D. Adams v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.

Adams · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma · March 18, 2026 · No. 23-CV-278-RAW

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma rules on Plaintiff Ashley D. Adams’s motion in limine seeking to exclude health records and evidence of alleged prior drug use. The court grants the motion as to physical and mental health evidence, and grants it in part and denies it in part as to alleged prior drug use, allowing the evidence only insofar as it may show that Mr. Adams had a history of methamphetamine use.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff's physical and mental health were not at issue in the case, so the challenged health records and related evidence were excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 401.
  2. Evidence of Plaintiff's alleged prior drug use was admissible only insofar as it tended to prove that Mr. Adams had a history of methamphetamine use; it was not relevant for broader assertions concerning the effect of drugs on Plaintiff's memory.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether evidence concerning Plaintiff Ashley Adams's physical and mental health and related health records was relevant and admissible.
  2. Whether evidence of Plaintiff's alleged prior drug use was relevant and admissible beyond the narrow issue of whether Mr. Adams had a history of methamphetamine use.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Mendelsohn v. Sprint/United Management Co., 587 F. Supp. 2d 1201, 1208 (D. Kan. 2008), aff'd, 402 F. App'x 337 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Jones v. Stotts, 59 F.3d 143, 146 (10th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Luce, 469 U.S. at 41(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…