Summary
The document is a Report and Recommendation from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma concerning Defendant Dura-Line LLC’s motion to dismiss Thomas T. Davis’s employment-discrimination and retaliation claims. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 41(b) based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with discovery obligations and conditions imposed when an earlier action was dismissed. The recommendation applies the Tenth Circuit’s Ehrenhaus factors and finds that dismissal is warranted.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge concluded that dismissal with prejudice was warranted because Plaintiff failed to comply with the explicit discovery conditions imposed by the prior dismissal order.
- The magistrate judge found Plaintiff solely culpable for failing to provide the required discovery responses and characterized the noncompliance as willful.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order requiring complete discovery responses within ten days of refiling warranted dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b).
- Whether Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order and discovery obligations warranted dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
- Whether the five Ehrenhaus factors supported dismissal with prejudice rather than a lesser sanction.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Ehrenhaus v. Reynolds, 965 F.2d 916, 918, 921 (10th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- AdvantEdge Bus. Grp. v. Thomas E. Mestmaker & Assocs., Inc., 552 F.3d 1233, 1236 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Gripe v. City of Enid, Oklahoma, 312 F.3d 1184, 1187 (10th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Mobley v. McCormick, 40 F.3d 337, 341 (10th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- M.E.N. Co. v. Control Fluidics, Inc., 834 F.2d 869, 872-73 (10th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Smith v. City and County of Denver, No. 07-cv-00154-WDM-BNB, 2009 WL 485163, at *3 (D. Colo. 2009)(followed)
- Gross v. General Motors LLC, 441 F. App'x 562, 565 (10th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Anderberg v. Sitewise Corp., No. 15-cv-00501-CBS, 2016 WL 1090021, at *3 (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.