Kristeen Brooke Adams v. Texas Department of Public Safety, et al.

Adams · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division · December 1, 2025 · No. 6:25-CV-327-JDK-KNM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas adopts a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation after the plaintiff filed no objections. The court dismisses all pending claims without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Writing for the Court
Jeremy D. Kernodle
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Decision date
December 1, 2025
Docket number
6:25-CV-327-JDK-KNM
Procedural posture
The district court reviewed and adopted a magistrate judge's report and recommendation proposing dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute after the plaintiff failed to file objections.
Standard of review
When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court reviews factual findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law.
Precedential value
unpublished district court order
Parties
Kristeen Brooke Adams v. Texas Department of Public Safety, et al.
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

civil proceduresection 1983

Practice areas

civil procedurecivil rights

Questions Presented

  1. What standard of review applies when no party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation?
  2. Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute should be adopted.

Holdings

  1. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court reviews factual findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law.
  2. The district court may dismiss pending claims without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the magistrate judge's recommendation contains no clear error, abuse of discretion, or conclusions contrary to law.

Key quotations

The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 6) as the findings of this Court.

Factual background

Adams filed the action and was given an opportunity to amend her claims. She failed to prosecute the case sufficiently, leading the magistrate judge to recommend dismissal without prejudice. Adams did not file written objections to the report and recommendation.

Procedural history

Plaintiff filed the lawsuit on August 25, 2025. After allowing her an opportunity to amend, Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell recommended dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections were filed, and the district court adopted the recommendation and dismissed all pending claims without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…