Almalik Bryant v. Ms. Lewis, et al.

Civil No. 3:25cv591 (DJN) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division · June 18, 2026 · No. Civil No. 3:25cv591 (DJN)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted defendants’ motion to dismiss an inmate’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the denial of a kosher religious diet. The court dismissed the First Amendment claim without prejudice and permitted amendment, finding that the complaint did not adequately allege a substantial burden on religious exercise. The Sixth Amendment claim was dismissed with prejudice because the claim did not concern a criminal prosecution.

Holdings

  1. The court would not consider Bryant's unauthorized sur-reply or supplemental allegations because further briefing was not permitted without leave under the local rules and Bryant had not obtained leave to supplement or amend his complaint.
  2. The complaint did not plausibly allege that defendants imposed a substantial burden on Bryant's religious exercise because it did not specifically explain how the offered diet conflicted with his religious requirements and alleged that he experienced hunger only from time to time while declining processed meats for reasons that appeared unrelated to religion.
  3. The First Amendment claim was dismissed without prejudice, and Bryant was permitted to file an amended complaint because amendment did not appear necessarily futile.
  4. The Sixth Amendment did not apply because it protects rights in criminal prosecutions, and Bryant's diet-related claim did not concern any past or future criminal proceeding.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Bryant's allegations plausibly stated a First Amendment free-exercise claim based on denial of a kosher or religiously compliant diet.
  2. Whether Bryant could maintain a Sixth Amendment claim based on the alleged denial of a religiously compliant diet in a civil § 1983 action.
  3. Whether Bryant's unauthorized sur-reply or supplemental allegations could be considered in deciding the motion to dismiss.
  4. Whether dismissal of the First Amendment claim should be with prejudice where amendment might not be futile.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (29)

  • Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975)(followed)
  • Republican Party of N.C. v. Martin, 980 F.2d 943, 952 (4th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • A4ylan Labs., Inc. v. Matkari, 7 F.3d 1130, 1134 (4th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 556, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)(followed)
  • Bass v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 324 F.3d 761, 765 (4th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Dickson v. Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 213 (4th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Iodice v. United States, 289 F.3d 270, 281 (4th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10 (1980)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 29.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…