Christopher S. George v. Sergeant Brown

George v. Brown · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division · December 15, 2025 · No. 3:24CV318 (RCY)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia grants Christopher S. George’s motion for default judgment against Sergeant Brown in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court concludes that the allegations establish deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment based on Brown’s alleged unlocking of George’s cell during a lockdown, which enabled an inmate assault. The court awards $94,042.96 in damages, consisting of documented medical expenses and compensation for pain and suffering.

Holdings

  1. After the Clerk entered default and the Court determined that the well-pleaded allegations stated a viable claim, the Court had discretion to enter default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).
  2. Service was adequate because George posted the summons and Complaint at the main entrance of Brown's residence, mailed the process to her, and established that Brown received actual, timely notice; Virginia's service savings provision cured any defect in the form of service.
  3. The Complaint stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim because Brown allegedly unlocked George's cell during lockdown, exposing him to a substantial risk of serious harm from other inmates, and that conduct enabled the ensuing attack.
  4. Qualified immunity did not bar the claim because an intentional violation of the Eighth Amendment is sufficient to overcome qualified immunity.
  5. The amount of damages was not deemed admitted merely because Defendant defaulted; the Court independently determined an appropriate award of $94,042.96 based on the hearing evidence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Court had subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and proper venue to enter default judgment.
  2. Whether George adequately served Sergeant Brown so that the Court could exercise jurisdiction over her.
  3. Whether the well-pleaded allegations, deemed admitted upon default, stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  4. What amount of compensatory damages was supported by the evidence presented at the default-judgment hearing.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (29)

  • Goldbelt Wolf, LLC v. Operational Wear Armor, LLC, 2016 WL 726532, at *2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016)(followed)
  • Colleton Prep. Acad., Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc., 616 F.3d 413, 417-18 (4th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Labuda v. SEF Stainless Steel, Inc., 2012 WL 1899417, at *2 (D. Md. May 23, 2012)(followed)
  • S.E.C. v. Lawbaugh, 359 F. Supp. 2d 418, 421 (D. Md. 2005)(followed)
  • EMI April Music, Inc. v. White, 618 F. Supp. 2d 497, 505 (E.D. Va. 2009)(followed)
  • Globalsantafe Corp. v. Globalsantafe.Com, 250 F. Supp. 2d 610, 612 n.3 (E.D. Va. 2003)(followed)
  • Getir U.S., Inc. v. <GETIR190.COM>, a domain name, 2023 WL 3061870, at *4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2023)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Burbach Broadcasting Co. of Del. v. Elkins Radio Corp., 278 F.3d 401, 406 (4th Cir. 2002)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 29.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…