Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia grants the respondent’s motion to dismiss a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition filed by Collin Zachary LaFreniere. The court rejects his ineffective-assistance claim concerning counsel’s failure to ensure enforcement of a jail hold order and to seek reconsideration of his sentence, concluding that he failed to establish prejudice under Strickland v. Washington. The petition is denied, the action is dismissed, and a certificate of appealability is denied.
Holdings
- Federal habeas relief was unavailable because the state habeas court's rejection of the claim did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law or an unreasonable determination of the facts.
- LaFreniere failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability that counsel's alleged failures affected the outcome of the sentence or post-trial proceedings.
Questions Presented
- Whether the state habeas court unreasonably applied Strickland v. Washington or unreasonably determined the facts in rejecting LaFreniere's ineffective-assistance claim.
- Whether counsel's alleged failure to enforce the local-jail hold order or seek sentence reconsideration prejudiced LaFreniere.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (12)
- Gray v. Branker, 529 F.3d 220, 228 (4th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473 (2007)(followed)
- Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 410 (2000)(followed)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 689, 694, 697 (1984)(followed)
- Burch v. Corcoran, 273 F.3d 577, 588 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 111-12 (2011)(followed)
- Waters v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 133, 139 (1999)(followed)
- McMorris v. Commonwealth, 276 Va. 500, 505 (2008)(followed)
- Carter v. Commonwealth, 232 Va. 122, 126-27 (1986)(followed)
- Clanton v. Commonwealth, 53 Va. App. 561, 567 (2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…