Summary
The court addresses Kanasha Woods’s claims against Ascension Health under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Wisconsin law concerning overtime computation and alleged off-the-clock work. The court grants Woods’s motion to stay pending the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Lutz v. Froedtert Health Inc. and denies Ascension’s motions to dismiss without prejudice or as moot.
Holdings
- A stay was appropriate because the case was at an early stage, the Lutz appeal presented an identical and potentially dispositive issue, and Ascension did not show undue prejudice from a stay.
- Ascension's motion to dismiss the original complaint was denied as moot because Woods filed an amended complaint.
- Ascension's motion to dismiss the amended complaint was denied without prejudice while the proceedings were stayed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the proceedings should be stayed pending the Seventh Circuit's decision in Lutz v. Froedtert Health Inc.
- Whether Ascension's motion to dismiss the amended complaint should be decided before the Seventh Circuit provides guidance on the allegedly identical overtime-computation issue.
- Whether Ascension's motion to dismiss the original complaint became moot after Woods filed an amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed. Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)(followed)
- Grice Eng’g, Inc. v. JG Innovations, Inc., 691 F. Supp. 2d 915, 920 (W.D. Wis. 2010)(followed)
- Lutz v. Froedtert Health Inc., No. 23-CV-974, 2025 WL 2049206 (E.D. Wis. July 22, 2025)(applied)
- Lutz v. Froedtert Health Inc., No. 23-CV-974, 2025 WL 2804431 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 2, 2025)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…