Gregory Kelly, et al. v. State Farm Insurance Company

Kelly · United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division · December 15, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-795-ECM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama overruled the Plaintiffs’ objections and adopted the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. The court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute, and directed that future shotgun pleadings filed by Gregory Kelly or anyone acting in concert with him may be summarily dismissed after appropriate review. The court also denied pending motions as moot and terminated pending deadlines.

Holdings

  1. A district court must review disputed portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation de novo when a party makes timely and sufficiently specific objections; otherwise, the recommendation is reviewed for clear error.
  2. The plaintiffs' objections were insufficiently specific to warrant de novo review because they did not identify any specific error in the magistrate judge's findings or conclusions.
  3. Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because the plaintiffs failed to comply with court orders and failed to file an amended complaint that complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  4. The court ordered that, after appropriate review, it would summarily dismiss without prejudice any future shotgun complaint filed by Gregory Kelly or anyone acting in concert with him.

Questions Presented

  1. What standard of review governs a district court's review of objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation?
  2. Whether the plaintiffs' objections were sufficiently specific to warrant de novo review of the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.
  3. Whether dismissal without prejudice was warranted because the plaintiffs failed to comply with court orders and failed to file a complaint complying with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  4. Whether the court should order that future shotgun pleadings filed by Gregory Kelly or anyone acting in concert with him be summarily dismissed without prejudice.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (5)

  • United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 674 (1980)(followed)
  • Jeffrey S. by Ernest S. v. State Bd. of Educ. of State of Ga., 896 F.2d 507, 513 (11th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 750 (11th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Kelly v. Montgomery Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Bd., 2:24-cv-348-RAH-JTA (M.D. Ala. May 21, 2025)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…