Luc Quy Tran v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South, Miami Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Enforcement and Removal Operations, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General

Tran · United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division · January 20, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-1224-KCD-NPM

Summary

The court denied Luc Quy Tran’s emergency motion for a temporary restraining order in his habeas case. It held that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) bars the court from enjoining execution of his removal order, that a transfer from the district would not destroy jurisdiction, and that his request for an order requiring compliance with due process was an impermissible broad “obey the law” injunction. The habeas petition will proceed to review on the merits.

Holdings

  1. The district court lacked jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) to enjoin the Government's execution of Tran's removal order.
  2. An injunction preventing Tran's transfer from the judicial district was unnecessary because a later transfer and change in physical custodian would not destroy jurisdiction over the already-filed § 2241 petition.
  3. The court could not issue the requested broad injunction requiring the Government to provide notice and an opportunity to present a fear-based claim because it was an impermissible general obey-the-law injunction.
  4. Tran was not entitled to a temporary restraining order because the specific relief sought was either beyond the court's jurisdiction or unnecessary, and he therefore could not establish the required prerequisites for extraordinary injunctive relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court had jurisdiction to enjoin execution of Tran's removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).
  2. Whether an injunction preventing Tran's transfer from the judicial district was necessary to preserve the court's jurisdiction over his § 2241 petition.
  3. Whether the court could issue an injunction requiring the Government to provide meaningful notice and an opportunity to present a fear-based claim before removal to a third country.
  4. Whether Tran satisfied the four-part standard for a temporary restraining order.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo, 403 F.3d 1223, 1225-26 (11th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 840 F.3d 1244, 1247 (11th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Sekona v. Perez, No. 1:19-CV-00400-JLT-HBK, 2025 WL 2140093, at *2 (E.D. Cal. July 29, 2025)(followed)
  • Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471, 482 (1999)(followed)
  • Camarena v. Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 988 F.3d 1268, 1271 (11th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Edwin M.-N. v. Green, No. CV 19-6096 (KM), 2019 WL 13299141, at *2 (D.N.J. Feb. 19, 2019)(followed)
  • Rivera-Amador v. Rhoden, No. 3:25-CV-1460-WWB-SJH, 2025 WL 3687452, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 19, 2025)(followed)
  • Lopez v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center, No. 4:18-CV-134-CDL-MSH, 2018 WL 7051097, at *2 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 26, 2018)(followed)
  • Torres-Mejia v. Trump, No. 1:25-CV-1623, 2025 WL 3684258, at *9 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2025)(followed)
  • Villa v. Normand, No. 5:25-CV-89, 2025 WL 3113200, at *4 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 16, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…