Barbara Penaroque and Antonio Penaroque v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Daniel Torres

Penaroque · United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division · December 4, 2025 · No. 6:25-cv-1543-PGB-LHP

Summary

The court addresses three discovery motions concerning depositions, document production, and sanctions in an insurance action removed from state court. It orders supplemental briefing on whether prior state-court discovery remains effective after removal, whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30 limits renewed depositions, and whether production or sanctions may be compelled based on state-court discovery.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(A)(ii) limits depositions in federal court when the same deponent was previously deposed in state court before removal.
  2. Whether the federal court may compel production or impose sanctions based on written discovery served and answered in state court, particularly when the motion is filed more than two years after the discovery was served.
  3. Whether the parties stipulated to renewed depositions and, if Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(ii) applies, whether leave of court is required.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Map & Globe, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., No. 6:20-cv-1584-Orl-40GJK, 2020 WL 6887934, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2020)(followed as persuasive authority)
  • Atwell v. Oliveras, No. 6:24-cv-2060-CEM-RMN, 2025 WL 1167834, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2025)(persuasive authority)
  • Woods v. Waste Pro USA, Inc., No. 5:20-cv-144-AW-MJF, 2021 WL 4125889, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2021)(persuasive authority)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…