Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed Richard Perez’s civil rights complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. The court found the complaint incomprehensible and directed the Clerk to close the case and provide Perez with complaint and in forma pauperis forms.
Holdings
- A court is not required to comb through an incomprehensible pleading, act as de facto counsel, or rewrite a deficient pleading to create a viable claim, even when the plaintiff is proceeding pro se.
- The action had to be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court was required to reconstruct an essentially incomprehensible pro se pleading to identify claims and defendants.
- Whether the pleading stated a claim on which relief could be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Gold v. Geo Gr., Inc., 2016 WL 7034404, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 2, 2016)(followed)
- GJR Invs. v. Cnty. Of Escambia, Fla., 182 F.3d 1359, 1869 (11th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701, 709 (11th Cir. 2010)(overruled_authority)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…