Summary
The court denied Ervin Joiner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal as moot. The court concluded that Joiner’s notice of appeal did not identify the issues for appeal as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), and that he could not appeal without a certificate of appealability, which the court had previously denied.
Holdings
- A notice of appeal supporting an application to proceed in forma pauperis must identify the issues the appellant intends to present on appeal; Plaintiff's notice did not satisfy that requirement.
- A petitioner may not appeal the dismissal of a § 2254 petition without a certificate of appealability.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be granted when his notice of appeal failed to identify the issues to be presented as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a).
- Whether Plaintiff could pursue an appeal without a certificate of appealability after the court denied him one.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Cobble v. Sellers, No. 5:14-cv-313-MTT, 2014 WL 5364028, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Oct. 21, 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…