Nick M. Bajalia and Monique Bajalia v. Giantex Inc., et al.

Bajalia · United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Valdosta Division · January 21, 2026 · No. 7:24-CV-134 (LAG)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia grants the parties’ consent motion for a protective order concerning the plaintiffs’ confidential medical information and records. The court adopts the parties’ proposed protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).

Holdings

  1. A stipulated protective order is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to facilitate discovery where the court finds good cause, and the court therefore granted the parties' joint motion and adopted their proposed consent protective order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should grant the parties' consent motion and enter a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect confidential medical information and records during discovery.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Chicago Trib. Co. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litig., 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…