Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissed DeVante Davis’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of a sentence reduction for completing the Residential Drug Abuse Program. The court held that Davis’s conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm disqualified him from the reduction under 28 C.F.R. § 550.55(b), and that the denial did not depend on classifying his offense as a crime of violence.
Holdings
- Davis was not entitled to habeas relief because his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm disqualified him from an RDAP sentence reduction under the applicable regulation.
- The record did not show that the BOP classified Davis's conviction as a crime of violence; the BOP instead relied on the firearm-based exclusion in the current version of 28 C.F.R. § 550.55(b).
Questions Presented
- Whether Davis was entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 based on the Bureau of Prisons' denial of an RDAP sentence reduction.
- Whether a felony conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm disqualifies an inmate from an RDAP sentence reduction under 28 C.F.R. § 550.55(b)(5)(ii).
- Whether the Bureau of Prisons denied the reduction by improperly classifying Davis's offense as a crime of violence.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994)(followed)
- VanOchten v. United States, No. 1:25-CV-00133, 2025 WL 1644370, at *1 (M.D. Pa. June 9, 2025)(cited)
- Harvey v. Warden/Superintendent of USP Canaan, No. 21-CV-02150, 2022 WL 2292006, at *5 (M.D. Pa. June 24, 2022)(cited)
- Jenkins v. Greene, No. 1:25-CV-730, 2025 WL 2796766, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 29, 2025)(followed)
- Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241-45 (2001)(followed)
- Taylor v. Warden, No. 3:26-CV-408, 2026 WL 579472, at *3-6 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026)(cited)
- United States v. Davis, No. 4:23-CR-00067, Doc. 48 (E.D. Mo.)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…