Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled on Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to seal documents submitted in support of a discovery letter brief. The court granted Defendants’ request to keep Exhibits G and J under seal based on potential competitive harm, denied the motion as to the remaining exhibits, and ordered Plaintiffs to file unredacted copies by May 15, 2025.
Holdings
- Exhibits G and J should remain under seal because good cause was shown to protect their technical details from disclosure and the resulting competitive harm.
- The administrative motion was denied as to all other exhibits because the record did not support sealing them based solely on Defendants' confidentiality designations.
Questions Presented
- Whether Exhibits G and J should remain under seal because good cause supported protecting their technical contents from disclosure.
- Whether the other exhibits at issue should be filed under seal based solely on Defendants' confidentiality designations.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1103 (9th Cir. 2016)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…