Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California addresses a discovery dispute concerning redactions to Plaintiff’s medical records. Applying California privilege law, the Court holds that Plaintiff waived the physician-patient and psychotherapist-patient privileges only as to Lyme disease, Epstein-Barr virus, post-concussive syndrome, physical pain resulting from those conditions, and emotional distress. The Court permits redaction of unrelated medical information and orders the parties to submit a further joint discovery letter brief and records for in camera review.
Holdings
- By placing Lyme disease, Epstein-Barr virus, post-concussive syndrome, physical pain resulting from those conditions, and emotional distress at issue, Plaintiff waived the physician-patient and psychotherapist-patient privileges as to information concerning those conditions and injuries, but not as to unrelated medical conditions.
- When a medical appointment concerns both a condition placed at issue and a condition not placed at issue, waiver attaches only to the portions of the record concerning the condition at issue, and the remaining portions may be redacted.
- Plaintiff's authorization allowing medical providers to provide records to his attorney did not waive privilege as to Defendant.
- Defendant was not entitled to sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 because it had not yet obtained relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff waived the physician-patient and psychotherapist-patient privileges by placing particular medical conditions and emotional and physical injuries at issue in the lawsuit.
- Whether privilege waiver extends to unrelated medical conditions merely because they were addressed during the same medical appointment as a condition placed at issue.
- Whether Plaintiff's authorization for medical providers to release records to his attorney waived privilege as to Defendant.
- Whether Defendant was entitled to sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- In re Lifschutz, 2 Cal. 3d 415, 435-36 (1970)(followed)
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, 37 Cal. 2d 227, 232 (1951)(followed)
- Britt v. Superior Court, 20 Cal. 3d 844, 849, 862-64 (1978)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.