Marcus Hoper, Sr. v. Ron DeSantis, et al.

Hoper · United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division · March 17, 2026 · No. 4:26-cv-108-MW/MJF

Summary

A United States magistrate judge recommends remanding a removed Florida state-court action because the plaintiff did not pay the federal filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. The recommendation also concludes that 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) authorizes removal by defendants, not plaintiffs. The magistrate judge recommends remand to the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida, and closure of the federal case.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division
Writing for the Court
Michael J. Frank
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division
Decision date
March 17, 2026
Docket number
4:26-cv-108-MW/MJF
Procedural posture
Report and recommendation on a plaintiff's second attempt to remove a civil action from Florida state court.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Parties
Marcus Hoper, Sr. v. Ron DeSantis, et al.
Disposition
other

Topics

civil procedurefederalism

Practice areas

civil procedureremoval jurisdiction

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the case should be remanded because plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis as required by the Northern District of Florida's local rules.
  2. Whether a plaintiff may remove a civil action from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a).

Holdings

  1. A party removing a civil action must simultaneously pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff's failure to do so independently supported remand.
  2. Section 1441(a) authorizes removal by the defendant or defendants, not by a plaintiff who originally chose to file the action in state court.

Key quotations

[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. (2)

Factual background

Plaintiff originally filed the civil action in a Florida state court. After choosing the state forum, he attempted to remove the action to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), making this his second removal attempt. He did not pay the removal filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Procedural history

The action originated in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) on March 2, 2026, but did not pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The magistrate judge recommended remand because plaintiff failed to comply with the filing-fee requirement and because § 1441(a) authorizes removal by defendants, not plaintiffs. The recommendation also advised that the clerk should close the federal case.

Remand instructions

The magistrate judge recommended that the District Court remand the civil action to the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida, and direct the clerk to close the federal case file.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…