Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa granted Rashpal Singh’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, holding that he was not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) and instead remained eligible for bond under § 1226(a). The court directed respondents to immediately release Singh on his previously set $7,500 bond because they offered no evidence of changed circumstances warranting revocation. The court denied Singh’s motion to strike the respondents’ response.
Holdings
- Singh was not subject to mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2); the court applied its prior reasoning that similarly situated aliens do not fall within that provision.
- Singh was entitled to immediate release on the conditions of his previously set $7,500 bond because the respondents offered no evidence of changed factual circumstances warranting revocation.
- The court denied Singh's motion to strike the respondents' resistance.
Questions Presented
- Whether Singh was subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), or instead eligible for bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether Singh was entitled to release on the previously set $7,500 bond.
- Whether Singh's motion to strike the respondents' resistance should be granted.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Giron Reyes v. Lyons, 801 F. Supp. 3d 797 (N.D. Iowa 2025)(followed)
- Chilel Chilel v. Sheehan, No. 25-cv-4053, 2025 WL 3158617 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 12, 2025)(followed)
- Valero-Cabeza v. ICE, No. 25-cv-217, 2026 WL 296218, at *1 n.2 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 4, 2026)(followed)
- Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, __ F.4th __, 2026 WL 323330 (5th Cir. Feb. 6, 2026)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…