Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed Soretha M. Eldridge’s pro se action against Equifax Information Services, LLC under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and 18 U.S.C. § 1595. The court granted in forma pauperis status but dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) because it lacked factual allegations sufficient to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to satisfy Rule 8 because it did not provide factual allegations sufficient to give Equifax fair notice of the claims or the grounds on which they rested.
- The complaint did not state a claim under § 1681c-2 because it did not allege facts showing what information was subject to a statutory block request, how the request was made, or why Equifax's conduct violated the statute.
- The action was dismissed under § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 by providing fair notice of the legal claims and the factual grounds supporting them.
- Whether the complaint stated a plausible claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c-2.
- Whether the action was subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982) (per curiam)(followed)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)(followed)
- Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. (1989); Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327(followed)
- Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 564 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009)(followed)
- Bibbo v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 151 F.3d 559, 561 (6th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…