Park Lane Pizzeria, Inc. v. Northwood PL Holdings LP

Park Lane Pizzeria · United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division · February 9, 2026 · No. 3:25-CV-02513-X

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied Northwood PL Holdings LP's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss claims by Park Lane Pizzeria, Inc. arising from alleged failures to supply condenser water required under a commercial lease. The court held that the statute-of-limitations defense was not clear on the face of the complaint because the plaintiff alleged a continuing contract and repudiation in October 2023.

Holdings

  1. A statute-of-limitations defense may support dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion only when the defense is clear on the face of the complaint.
  2. The motion to dismiss was denied because the complaint did not clearly establish that Park Lane's claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint should be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) because the plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations.
  2. Whether the alleged continuing nature of the lease and the alleged October 2023 repudiation prevented the limitations defense from being established on the face of the complaint.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, 224 F.3d 496, 498 (5th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Seghers v. El Bizri, 513 F. Supp. 2d 694, 707 (N.D. Tex. 2007)(followed)
  • Jones v. Alcoa, Inc., 339 F.3d 359, 366 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1161 (2004)(followed)
  • Berry v. Bryan Cave LLP, 2010 WL 1946264, at *5 (N.D. Tex. 2010)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…