Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California considers Fossil Group, Inc.'s motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Fossil's "Like Style" pricing and discount representations violated California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law. The court grants in part and denies in part the motion, addressing judicial notice, incorporation by reference, pleading particularity, and the reasonable-consumer standard. The excerpt does not include the complete disposition of each claim.
Holdings
- The complaint sufficiently pleaded the UCL and FAL claims under Rules 8 and 9(b), so dismissal of those claims was denied.
- The complaint plausibly alleged that Fossil's Like Style pricing and discount representations were likely to deceive reasonable consumers; whether the practice was deceptive was not suitable for resolution on a motion to dismiss.
- Plaintiffs lacked standing to seek injunctive or other prospective equitable relief because they did not allege an actual and imminent threat that they would again be subjected to Fossil's allegedly false advertising.
- The court denied judicial notice of the contents of Fossil's webpage disclosure, in-store signage, and labels from other cases; granted incorporation by reference of the online Like Style disclosure because the complaint reproduced and relied on it; and denied incorporation by reference of the in-store return policy.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint pleaded the UCL and FAL claims with sufficient factual particularity under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 9(b).
- Whether the alleged Like Style pricing representations could plausibly deceive a reasonable consumer under California's UCL and FAL.
- Whether plaintiffs had standing to seek prospective injunctive or other equitable relief based on past allegedly misleading advertising.
- Whether Fossil's exhibits were subject to judicial notice or incorporation by reference at the pleading stage.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (40)
- Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729, 732 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- SmileCare Dental Grp. v. Delta Dental Plan of Cal., 88 F.3d 780, 783 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
- Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 526 (1983)(followed)
- Thompson v. Davis, 295 F.3d 890, 895 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co., 567 F.3d 1120, 1124 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Bly-Magee v. California, 236 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Neubronner v. Milken, 6 F.3d 666, 671-72 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- United States v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 40.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.