Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining order. The court directed Respondents to arrange an individualized bond hearing before an immigration court within fourteen days and required a joint status report regarding the hearing and potential mootness.
Holdings
- The court granted Petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and directed Respondents to arrange an individualized bond hearing before an immigration court within fourteen days.
- The court rejected Respondents' jurisdictional argument and exercised jurisdiction to grant the temporary restraining order.
Questions Presented
- Whether Petitioner was entitled to a temporary restraining order requiring an individualized bond hearing before an immigration court.
- Whether Respondents' jurisdictional objection deprived the court of authority to grant the requested relief.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Sadeqi v. LaRose, No. 25-cv-2587-RSH-BJW, 2025 WL 3154520 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2025)(adopted)
- Soleimani v. LaRose, Case No. 25-cv-3082-DMS-DEB, ECF No. 7 at 4(followed)
- Jimenez Lopez v. Archambeault, Case No. 25cv3029 DMS (BLM), ECF No. 7 at 3(followed)
- Vasquez Garcia v. Noem, ___ F.Supp.3d ___, Case No. 25-cv-02180-DMS-MMP, 2025 WL 2549431, at *3-4 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2025)(followed)
- Medina-Ortiz v. Noem, No. 25-cv-02819-DMS-MMP, ECF No. 7 at 3-4(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…