Shane H. v. Frank Bisignano

No. 19-cv-1435-RSH-KSC (S.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025) · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · December 22, 2025 · No. 19-cv-1435-RSH-KSC

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court approves $63,308, representing 25% of the claimant’s past-due Social Security benefits, and directs the Commissioner to pay counsel $52,667.75 after offsetting previously awarded EAJA fees. The court finds the contingent-fee agreement and requested amount reasonable.

Holdings

  1. A contingent-fee agreement providing counsel 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits is within the statutory limit imposed by § 406(b)(1)(A).
  2. The requested $63,308 fee was reasonable and should not be reduced.
  3. The § 406(b) award must be offset by the EAJA fees previously awarded for the same work, resulting in a net payment of $52,667.75.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the contingent-fee agreement providing counsel 25 percent of Plaintiff's past-due benefits complied with the statutory limit under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
  2. Whether the requested $63,308 attorney's-fee award was reasonable under § 406(b), including whether it should be reduced because of substandard representation, delay, fraud or overreaching, or a windfall.
  3. Whether the § 406(b) award had to be offset by the EAJA fees previously awarded for the same work.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 793, 796, 802, 807-808 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1145, 1147-1148, 1151 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
  • Parrish v. Comm'r of SSA, 698 F.3d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Branch v. Bisignano, No. 21-cv-785-KSC, 2025 WL 3238183, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2025)(followed)
  • Roland S. v. Kijakazi, No. 3:20-CV-01068-AHG, 2023 WL 6966153, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)(followed)
  • Desiree D. v. Saul, No. 3:19-CV-01522-RBM, 2021 WL 1564331, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021)(followed)
  • Martinez v. Saul, 15-CV-1994-BTM-BGS, 2019 WL 3322481, at *2 (S.D. Cal. July 24, 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…