Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Timothy Stephens’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. After screening the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the court dismissed it without prejudice and granted leave to amend because the allegations did not state a claim and the requested relief likely exceeded the court’s jurisdiction.
Holdings
- A plaintiff whose disability income hardly exceeds monthly expenses may proceed without prepaying the court-filing fee; complete destitution is not required.
- The complaint was dismissed because its conclusory allegations did not state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
- The requested remedy of televised military tribunals likely exceeded the district court's jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether Stephens should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis based on his financial circumstances.
- Whether the complaint stated a claim under the mandatory screening standard of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
- Whether the requested remedy of televised military tribunals was within the district court's jurisdiction.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Blount v. Saul, No. 21-CV-0679-BLM, 2021 WL 1561453, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…