Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff Fred Wennberg’s election to proceed with a new trial. The Court held that the challenged damages awards for past lost wage-earning capacity were legally impermissible under Eleventh Circuit precedent and could be stricken without providing a new-trial option. The Court also ordered mediation concerning Plaintiff Eric Ward’s punitive damages.
Holdings
- A motion styled as a motion to strike an election of a new trial may be construed as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) when it challenges the Court's prior order granting the new-trial option.
- Reconsideration was warranted because the prior grant of a new-trial option constituted a manifest error of law.
- The Seventh Amendment did not require Wennberg to receive the option of a new trial because the Court corrected legally impermissible damages under Rule 50 rather than substituting its judgment for the jury's as to the appropriate amount of damages.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendants' motion to strike Wennberg's election to proceed with a new trial should be treated as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b).
- Whether the Court's prior elimination of Wennberg's lost-earning-capacity awards was a legal-error correction under Rule 50, rather than a traditional remittitur requiring an option of a new trial under the Seventh Amendment.
- Whether Wennberg was entitled to elect a new trial after the Court determined that the challenged damages were not legally supportable because the trial evidence was insufficient to establish the full extent of his post-injury earning capacity.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Buland v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., 992 F.3d 1143, 1152 (11th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 493, 511 (2008)(applied)
- Johansen v. Combustion Eng’g, Inc., 170 F.3d 1320, 1329-32 (11th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- New York, L.E. & W.R. Co. v. Estill, 147 U.S. 591, 622 (1893)(followed)
- Hetzel v. Prince William County, Va., 523 U.S. 208, 209, 211-12 (1998)(distinguished)
- Rasinski v. McCoy, 227 So. 3d 201, 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)(distinguished)
- Holmes v. West Palm Beach Housing Authority, 309 F.3d 752, 758 (11th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Dingman v. Cart Shield USA, LLC, No. 12-cv-20088, 2013 WL 2034984, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 14, 2013)(followed)
- Region 8 Forest Serv. Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock, 993 F.2d 800, 806 n.5 (11th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Marques v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A., 805 F. App’x 668, 670-71 (11th Cir. 2020)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…