Summary
The court dismisses Samantha Weber’s action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The court concludes that Weber’s notice of voluntary dismissal was ineffective because the defendant had already filed an answer, but treats her response as demonstrating that she no longer wished to pursue the case.
Holdings
- A plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) only before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Because defendant had filed an answer, Weber's notice was ineffective.
- The court may dismiss an action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute when the plaintiff fails to comply with the court's case-management or reporting requirements and indicates that she no longer wishes to pursue the action.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal was effective under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) after defendant had filed an answer.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Smith v. Potter, 513 F.3d 781, 782 (7th Cir. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…