Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois determines that diversity jurisdiction was lacking because the ownership chain of Goosehead Insurance Agency LLC included a member sharing Illinois citizenship with plaintiff Terrace Hudson. The court remands the case to the Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and denies the motion to remand as moot.
Holdings
- A party invoking diversity jurisdiction must affirmatively allege the specific states of citizenship of every member of an LLC or other unincorporated association, tracing citizenship through all layers of ownership.
- The court lacked diversity subject matter jurisdiction because at least one relevant member in Goosehead Insurance Agency LLC's chain of ownership shared Illinois citizenship with the plaintiff; remand was therefore required under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendants adequately pleaded complete diversity of citizenship to establish federal diversity jurisdiction.
- Whether remand was required because a member in Goosehead Insurance Agency LLC's ownership chain shared Illinois citizenship with the plaintiff.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Page v. Democratic National Committee, 2 F.4th 630, 634-36 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones, 177 U.S. 449, 453 (1900)(followed)
- Foster v. Hill, 497 F.3d 695, 696-97 (7th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 94 (2010)(followed)
- Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)(followed)
- Meyerson v. Harrah's East Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- White Pearl Inversiones S.A. (Uruguay) v. Cemusa, Inc., 647 F.3d 684, 686 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…