Lisett Pena-Font v. Scott A. Maples, Jr., Samuel Olson, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, and Todd Blanche

Lisett Pena-Font v. Scott A. Maples, Jr., No. 4:26-cv-00135-SEB-KMB (S.D. Ind. June 15, 2026) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division · June 15, 2026 · No. No. 4:26-cv-00135-SEB-KMB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana grants Lisett Pena-Font's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court holds that her detention is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2)(A), and orders the respondents to provide an individualized bond hearing or release her under reasonable conditions of supervision.

Holdings

  1. Pena-Font's detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), not § 1225(b)(2)(A), because she had entered the country, moved to the interior, and was arrested there pursuant to an administrative warrant.
  2. Continued detention under § 1226(a) without consideration of bond violates the INA, and Pena-Font was entitled to an individualized bond hearing.
  3. Immediate release was not required; the appropriate remedy was an individualized bond hearing, with release from custody required if respondents did not provide the hearing by the court's deadline.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Pena-Font's detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), which permits discretionary release on bond or conditional parole, or by 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), which requires detention during removal proceedings.
  2. Whether continued detention without an individualized bond hearing violated the Immigration and Nationality Act.
  3. What remedy was appropriate for detention that violated § 1226(a).

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (18)

  • Thomas v. Illinois, 697 F.3d 612, 613 (7th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 303, 306 (2018)(followed)
  • Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. 103, 107-08 (2020)(followed)
  • Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 520, 520 (BIA 2011)(followed)
  • Nielsen v. Preap, 586 U.S. 392, 397-98 (2019)(followed)
  • Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976, 982 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • In re Guerra, 24 I. & N. Dec. 37, 38 (BIA 2006)(followed)
  • Alejandro v. Olson, 817 F. Supp. 3d 672, 677 (S.D. Ind. 2025)(followed)
  • Singh v. Bondi, No. 1:25-cv-02101-SEB-TAB, 2025 WL 3029524, at *3-5 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 30, 2025)(followed)
  • Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494, 503 (5th Cir. 2026)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…