Tyson Myers v. Roy Washington NP, Denise Eden Nurse, Advanced Correctional Healthcare

Myers · United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division · February 17, 2026 · No. 4:23-cv-00182-TWP-KMB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted defendants' motion for summary judgment in Tyson Myers's action alleging inadequate medical care while detained at the Scott County Jail. The court held that Myers failed to exhaust available administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act and dismissed the action without prejudice.

Holdings

  1. The PLRA requires a prisoner to exhaust available administrative remedies before bringing an action concerning prison conditions, and the prisoner must comply strictly with the administrative rules established by the correctional institution.
  2. Defendants met their burden to prove that available administrative remedies existed and that Myers failed to use them for the claims asserted in the lawsuit.
  3. Summary judgment was appropriate because the undisputed record showed that Myers failed to exhaust available administrative remedies and did not identify admissible evidence creating a genuine dispute of material fact.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendants established that Myers had available administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
  2. Whether Myers exhausted those remedies before filing his constitutional medical-care claims.
  3. Whether the undisputed record entitled defendants to summary judgment and dismissal without prejudice.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (15)

  • Khungar v. Access Cmty. Health Network, 985 F.3d 565, 572-73 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Miller v. Gonzalez, 761 F.3d 822, 827 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Grant v. Trs. of Ind. Univ., 870 F.3d 562, 573-74 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)(followed)
  • Zerante v. DeLuca, 555 F.3d 582, 584 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986)(followed)
  • Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 532 (2002)(followed)
  • Reid v. Balota, 962 F.3d 325, 329 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90-91 (2006)(followed)
  • Dale v. Lappin, 376 F.3d 652, 655-56 (7th Cir. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…