Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted Danielle C.'s motion for attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand and favorable Social Security disability benefits determination. The court approved $21,605, representing 25% of the claimant's past-due benefits, and directed the Commissioner to pay the amount directly from those benefits to counsel. The court also required counsel to refund the previously awarded $1,460.25 in EAJA fees if counsel ultimately receives that amount and prohibited counsel from seeking additional fees under § 406(a).
Holdings
- A court may award a reasonable fee to a claimant's attorney for successful federal-court representation in a Social Security disability benefits appeal, subject to the statutory cap of 25% of the claimant's past-due benefits.
- The requested $21,605 fee was reasonable and did not constitute a windfall.
- When counsel receives both an EAJA fee award and a § 406(b) fee award for the same representation, counsel must refund the smaller award to the claimant.
- The $21,605 award was the final payment of all fees owed in the case under § 406, and counsel could not seek further fees under § 406(a).
Questions Presented
- Whether claimant's counsel was entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) based on 25% of the claimant's past-due benefits.
- Whether the requested $21,605 fee was reasonable under the factors identified in Gisbrecht v. Barnhart.
- Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded EAJA fees if he ultimately received them.
- Whether the § 406(b) award should be treated as the final payment of fees owed in the case under § 406 and preclude further fees under § 406(a).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (10)
- Koester v. Astrue, 482 F. Supp. 2d 1078, 1080 (E.D. Wis. 2007)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 795, 796, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595-96 (2010)(followed)
- Caldwell v. Berryhill, 2017 WL 2181142, at *1 (S.D. Ind. May 18, 2017)(followed)
- O'Donnell v. Saul, 983 F.3d 950, 953, 957 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Jennifer M. A. v. Bisignano, Case No. 1:23-cv-00470-MKK-JRS, Filing No. 31 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2026)(followed)
- Plummer v. O'Malley, 2024 WL 4880436, at *2 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 22, 2024)(followed)
- Janet H. v. Saul, 2020 WL 6946471, at *4-5 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 25, 2020)(followed)
- Wattles v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2012 WL 169967, at *1 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 2012)(followed)
- Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2019 WL 2408035, at *3 (N.D. Ind. May 30, 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.