Michael Shawn Jordan v. State of Mississippi

Jordan · United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division · January 30, 2026 · No. 1:25cv358-HSO-BWR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi dismissed Michael Shawn Jordan’s pro se petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice. The court construed the petition as seeking habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and dismissed it as duplicative of Jordan’s previously filed habeas action challenging the same convictions.

Holdings

  1. The district court lacked general authority to issue a writ of mandamus directing a state court or its judicial officers to perform their duties when mandamus was the only relief sought.
  2. Because Jordan sought to vacate his convictions and sentences and thereby obtain relief affecting his confinement, the petition was essentially a request for habeas relief and was construed, to the extent it sought release from confinement, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
  3. The action was duplicative because it challenged the same convictions and sentences as Jordan's earlier pending habeas petition in the same court, and it was therefore dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the federal district court could issue a writ of mandamus directing a Mississippi state court or its judicial officers to vacate Jordan's state convictions and sentences.
  2. Whether Jordan's mandamus petition should be liberally construed as a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 because it sought relief affecting the validity and duration of his confinement.
  3. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of Jordan's earlier pending § 2254 habeas action concerning the same convictions and sentences.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (7)

  • Jordan v. Johnson, 1:25-cv-330-HSO-ASH, No. [1] (S.D. Miss. Nov. 10, 2025)(followed)
  • Moye v. Clerk, Dekalb Cnty. Super. Ct., 474 F.2d 1275, 1276 (5th Cir. 1973)(followed)
  • Davis v. Fechtel, 150 F.3d 486, 487-88 (5th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Oliney v. Gardner, 771 F.2d 856, 859 (5th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Norwood v. United States, 235 F. App'x 231, 231 (5th Cir. July 24, 2007)(followed)
  • Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994, 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…